Two mega-home plan wins where ten failed
Saturday 4th October 2008, 9:56AM BST.
A FARMER has received outline Planning consent to build two large houses – which together would ‘be the size of the Greenhills Hotel’ – in the countryside.
It was decided at a Planning meeting on Thursday that Charlie Gallichan’s application to build two homes – with a maximum total size of 30,000 square feet – was an ‘insubstantial departure’ from the Island Plan 2002 and so could be approved by a Planning applications panel.
Mr Gallichan avoided a public inquiry, which would have been legally required to take place had his application been deemed a ‘substantial departure’ from the Island Plan.
At the meeting, Mr Gallichan, of Woodside Farm, Rue du Petit Aleval, was granted Planning principle to demolish two bungalows, agricultural buildings and temporary staff accommodation at his farm in St Peter so he can build two large houses on the site. Under the law, the panel, which took an hour to decide the application instead of the allocated 15 minutes, had to register that the application was an insubstantial departure and confirm their justification for that.
• Picture: Charlie Gallichan at Woodside Farm
Read the full story in the Jersey Evening Post. Click here for subscription details. Individual editions are also available online.
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals & Departures
Harbours Arrivals & Departures
Bus Information & Timetables
JOIN US ON...
Facebook and Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Got a story? Get in touch
KIT 4 CLUBS
Win a share of £10,000
2012 is the year of the London Olympics and to celebrate this great event the Jersey Evening Post, in association with sponsors Ogier is giving all sporting clubs a chance to win a share of £10,000.
again housing for the very rich and not one brick
for the first time buyer.
young people stand up for yourselves
where is your truly affordable housing?
Report abuse
Am I right in understanding that a previous application for 10 homes was rejected? I can’t believe this has happened. The chap has a right to develop his land and try to profit from it, but surely the States should try to seek maximum benefit for the people of Jersey. I am unqualified to comment but I might have expected that 10 homes would have generated a greater capital gain?
Get rid of our planners they have proven countless times they are unfit for their role.
Report abuse