Cormorant cull ‘may be needed to save fish’
Saturday 1st November 2008, 9:59AM GMT.
CORMORANTS are devastating the Island’s freshwater fish population and an application to cull the birds could be made if they cannot be stopped.
The problem has cost the Jersey Freshwater Angling Association thousands of pounds and is worsened by the fact that due to a change in EU regulations on aquatic animal health the JFAA cannot now replenish stocks like they used to by importing fish.
A JFAA spokesman said: ‘We will do all we can to put in preventative measures prior to sending an application in for a cull. But we’ve spent £25,000–£30,000 on fish in the last ten to 15 years and in one place we only have 30 fish in excess of 10 lb – everything else has been eaten.
‘We’ve also spent around £4,000 building fish refuges, approximately £600 trying to prevent birds from landing on the waters, and last year spent £4–5,000 on electronic bird scarers. There’s also the countless hours of members’ time putting things into place, so it’s not a case of “we’re losing some fish – let’s cull the birds”.
As little as ten birds on a lake can strip the place bare of a sustainable fish population within six months. Cormorants eat around 750 grams of fish a day, so for ten birds that’s 7.5 kilos, which is 75 kilos just to live for ten days. Also, if a cormorant can’t grab a fish, then it will spear it with its beak and the fish isn’t eaten but can’t survive.
Pictured: A cormorant with catch
Read the full story in the Jersey Evening Post. Click here for subscription details. Individual editions are also available online.
2012 CYCLE SLAM
Dallaglio Flintoff 2012 Cycle Slam
Read Graeme Le Saux's daily blogs
Greece-London Marathon on a Bike
The Dallaglio Flintoff 2012 Cycle Slam
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
Not being an angler, I don’t necessarily agree with a cull. And especially without some kind of scientific assessment, as surely native species(The Cormorant) should take precedence over non-native imported fish. Also, most water bodies stocked with fish in Jersey are man-made. If the effect of Cormorants living inland was to decimate natural populations then a cull may be a sound idea
Report abuse
This has been a bone of contention bettween anglers and conservationists in the UK for years. At some fishing lakes the trees are stripped of branches, they have been breacking under the weight of the birds roosting.
Report abuse
Cull lions, cull tigers, cull seals, cull whales… Let’s get rid of everything that competes with us on this planet. In fact, you know the best way to beat the opposition in a game of football? Cull them – then you can’t lose can you?
Report abuse
Surely, even if culled the population will increase again in line with available food. Nature is all about balance and as soon as man mucks up the equation, it’s the animals that have to suffer.
Surely killing birds so that anglers may fish is wrong???!!
Report abuse
At the risk of more hate mail, it happned last time, it is about time the island did something about Pheasants. These are most definitely NOT indigenous to the island. The landscape has not been ‘Natural’ since the first man learnt to dig a hole. Whether people like it or not, they will disturb other species. The Cormorants main enemy is other Cormorants. These are the direct competitors for food stocks, nesting places and mates. Nature is designed around things dying. Would anyone think of importing Grey Squirrels?
Report abuse