From David Rotherham.
IT is a great relief to learn that the possibility has been eliminated of the remains found under Haut de Ia Gar-enne being the result of foul play in our own time.

However, the reporting so far has left a few matters unclear. We have been led to understand that there is a great deal of evidence for criminal mistreatment of the home’s clients, in its last few decades of operation.

Now that the distraction of the murder question has been removed, one would hope that the investigation into this mistreatment, and into the connivance of those who should have put a stop to it, could proceed with more focus. In fact the credibility of the new people in charge will depend upon this happening. But the removal of Mr Power, who has hitherto been conspicuously firm in dealing with corruption cases, does not send a very reassuring signal.

Surely, thoroughly investigating small bones found in a place where violence is known to have been committed against children, and from where other children are reputed to have vanished without trace, is such an obvious necessity for the police that it would have been a sacking offence for the chief officer had he not done so.

To remove him for properly carrying out his duty seems, on the face of it, to be somewhat perverse. There is clearly more going on behind the scenes than has officially been made public. Senator Syvret’s conspiracy theories may not be the only possible explanation as to what is really happening, and I would be hugely reassured to see them disproved, but the picture that the public are being shown at present is, unfortunately, wholly compatible with his sinister suggestions.

The public of Jersey must be given much clearer explanations than we have seen this week of why so many of this year’s shocking revelations are now seen as unusable evidence. Otherwise, contrary to our government’s desires, we shall lose all faith in the integrity of our police.
Vue des Champs,
Rue de la Petite Lande,
Trinity.