Sark counts cost after businesses close
Monday 15th December 2008, 2:59PM GMT.
THE full human cost of the Barclay brothers’ decision to close its Sark business became apparent over the weekend.
Confusion, betrayal and anger were among the emotions expressed as shops, restaurants and hotels forced to close with immediate effect were left deserted and boarded up. However, some islanders have blamed a group of stuck-in-the-mud traditionalists who have rejected the brothers’ reforming ideas for the island’s current position.
In a show of solidarity, Sarkees have said that they will weather the storm as a community and have so far refused offers of help from other Channel Islands. There was some immediate help on the table today, though, following the announcement that £50,000 had been given by an anonymous donor.
Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay shut their businesses last week and withdrew investment from Sark after the island’s first full elections marking the end of 450 years of feudal rule did not go their way. Islanders rejected candidates who favoured their modernising reform agenda. In response, the brothers, who invest around £5 million a year in Sark, shut the many businesses they own, leaving more than 100 people, or a quarter of the island’s workforce, out of a job in the run-up to Christmas.
Read the full story in the Jersey Evening Post. Click here for subscription details. Individual editions are also available online.
The Queen's Diamond Jubilee
JEP Jubilee Editions
Saturday 2 June: Guide to Celebrations
Wednesday 6 June: Souvenir of Events
View The Queen in Jersey supplement
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
The Barcley brothers have shot themselves in the foot. They certainly won’t be welcome to show their faces now on Sark let alone the other islands. Sark should have nothing to do with the Barcleys now they’ve shown what they are capeable of – true colours is the descriptive phrase.
Report abuse
The Barclay Brothers are behaving like spoilt brats. Men of their age and calibre should know better!! So what if their candidates didn’t get in, you don’t enter a competition expecting to win, you take your chances like everyone else. So they invest £5mn p.a in Sark, they can afford it, so they shouldn’t take umbrage just because their chosen ones didn’t win, that’s the whole point of an election. I agree with the majority of Sark, don’t let two people ruin what is so lovely about Sark, its peace, beauty and tranquility, their ideas were far too grand and would not attract the everyday visitor to the island.
Report abuse
So much for modern day feudalism. Vote for us or else! The writing has been on the wall since the 5% buy up of the Island. Their agenda is very clear now. Sark has a unique and enviable lifestyle on a gem of an Island. It is not conducive to the claptrap of modern life. Not that the lifestyle is or was as the Dark Ages, as some would have you believe. Sark is NOT A CASH COW to be milked by whoever.
Report abuse
Lucky for Sarkees that they found out what was in store for them before those two chaps were able to take even more control. I believe I can guess just how many figs they give for Sark and its traditions: Less than two! I must say also that I have been rather surprised that they managed to get planning permission to build Dartmoor Prison on Brecquou.
Report abuse
I think this clearly shows what happens when you dance with the devil and its a lesson for us all to learn. Are we as Channel Islanders so reliant on 1.1k’s, are they so certain of their positions that they can act like tin plated demi-gods over us? Because of its size the problem shows up clearly in Sark but what about the rest of the Islands how much of our heritage and land have we sold out.
Report abuse
The Sark situation should serve as a warning to all Channel islanders.
Report abuse