Crucial flaws in the plan to compensate Woolies’ staff
Wednesday 7th January 2009, 2:59PM GMT.
From Francis Le Gresley, manager, Citizens Advice Bureau.
DEPUTY Geoff Southern’s proposition for redundancy payments to be provided by the States of Jersey to former employees of Woolworths plc, totalling £139,472, is obviously well intentioned but totally overlooks two critical facts:
• Jersey does not have a redundancy law and therefore no employer running a business in Jersey is currently legally required to make a redundancy payment to any employee whose job is no longer required, unless this is agreed contractually.
• The payment of redundancy monies, in the event of insolvency of the employer, is only possible where the government has created an insolvency fund, funded by a combination of contributions from employers and employees. In the UK this is known as the National Insurance Fund.
• The States of Jersey would have to agree to raise the current Social Security contributions of 6.5 per cent for employers and six per cent for employees in order to create such a fund.
Deputy Southern comments in his proposition that ‘the States of Jersey has a moral obligation to protect its workers to a standard which matches the UK’ but the States also has an obligation to treat all members of the community fairly and equally.
It follows therefore that former employees of Woolworths ought not to be given preferential treatment simply because they were employed on UK contracts while other former employees of failed businesses, on Jersey contracts, are not being offered similar recompense. If the members of the States are minded to approve this proposition then it has to apply retrospectively to all people who have recently lost their job through insolvency of the employer.
In the specific case of Woolworths, former employees in Jersey and the UK are entitled to make a claim to the Liquidator or Receiver, when appointed, for pay in lieu of notice, holiday pay, maternity pay, etc. An employee will be a preferential creditor up to a maximum of £800. For any money owed over this amount the employee will be treated as an ordinary creditor.
The administrators, Deloittes, are only responsible for the payment of wages to Woolworths’ staff for days worked since their appointment on 26 November 2008.
The Bureau has been providing this information to Woolworths’ employees since 11 December 2008 and therefore we are not surprised that the administrators refused to consider the payment of redundancy monies to staff in Jersey.
St Paul’s Centre,
New Street,
St Helier.
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals & Departures
Harbours Arrivals & Departures
Bus Information & Timetables
JOIN US ON...
Facebook and Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Got a story? Get in touch
KIT 4 CLUBS
Win a share of £10,000
2012 is the year of the London Olympics and to celebrate this great event the Jersey Evening Post, in association with sponsors Ogier is giving all sporting clubs a chance to win a share of £10,000.
So now CAB are having to explain the situation of redundancy in Jersey to Geoff Southern and the JDA. And no doubt they are being forced to put the record straight with people calling them. It really makes you wonder what this parties purpose is in the States.
Report abuse
JTM
They provide the comedy act
Report abuse
PJG – that’s expensive comedy!
Report abuse
Are there any members of the States playing straight parts?
I am looking forward to the Esplanade Quarter farce in which huge sums of money disappear into a large muddy hole down the Waterfront and the taxpayer ends up bailing the project out to the tune of tens of millions.
Report abuse
Actually joking aside I’m thankful Mr Le Gresley got in quick on this one. While Mr Southern portrays to be a man of the working class he fails to point out the cost of such a scheme to the working class and the fact they will be paying higher social security costs or tax to fund a scheme they will most likely never use because of the job stability we have in the Island.
The same people who currently moan about how expensive Jersey is, because of GST etc, will now moan about taking home even less salary without realising they supported Southern’s great scheme! Meanwhile Southern will move on to another flavour of the month further capitalising on the ‘more expensive Jersey’ this scheme will lead us to!
Report abuse
To add insult, these so called States Members are now asking for pay rises when we are heading towards a downturn. If this is the calibre of the thinking of the JDA then I demand a freeze.
Report abuse