Woolworths and the question of payment
Friday 30th January 2009, 2:57PM GMT.
From Francis Le Gresley, Citizens Advice Bureau manager.
IT is unfortunate that your newspaper failed to give any significant publicity to the news release from the joint administrators of Woolworths dated 21 January.
From Francis Le Gresley, Citizens Advice Bureau manager.
IT is unfortunate that your newspaper failed to give any significant publicity to the news release from the joint administrators of Woolworths dated 21 January.
Consequently, your readers may be unaware that ‘no employees of Woolworths, in about 800 units, have received notice monies or redundancy payments from their employer’.
The joint administrators were appointed by the company under paragraph 22 of schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 and are required to perform their functions in the interests of the company’s creditors as a whole.
In particular, the administrators are under a legal duty to observe the statutory order of priorities when dealing with creditors. An initial meeting of creditors with the administrators is due to take place in London on 3 February.
Employees’ preferential claims for wages are subject to the statutory limit of £800. There is no right to be paid in priority for debts over £800 arising from non-payment of pay in lieu of notice, whether they are statutory or contractual.
The administrators advise that the employees of the Jersey store were paid arrears of wages or salary due to them up to 27 November 2008, the date of the commencement of the administration, and for the period during which they worked for Woolworths in administration, as a cost of the administration.
Should the States of Jersey decide to pay to the employees of Woolworths their statutory notice pay entitlements, under the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003, totalling £139,466, a claim may be accepted by the administrators under the subrogated rights provisions of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
However, the priority claim would be for £40,939 and the balance of £98,527 would rank equally with those of the about 4,000 non-priority creditors, which will in due course include the subrogated non-priority claims made by the Redundancy Payments Offices, where Woolworths’ employees in England, Wales and Northern Ireland have been paid from the National Insurance Fund.
Having no knowledge of the assets and liabilities of the company, it is impossible to speculate how much money will be left for distribution to ordinary creditors, but the States would have to expect to write off a considerable proportion of their non-priority claim unless the proceeds of sale of leasehold and freehold assets, belonging to Woolworths in Jersey, can be seized by the Viscount for the exclusive benefit of creditors in Jersey.
St Paul’s Centre,
New Street,
St Helier.
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
JOIN US ON...
Facebook and Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Got a story? Get in touch
KIT 4 CLUBS
Win a share of £10,000
2012 is the year of the London Olympics and to celebrate this great event the Jersey Evening Post, in association with sponsors Ogier is giving all sporting clubs a chance to win a share of £10,000.
Having been both a Jersey resident and a long time Adviser (part and full time) in the Citizens Advice Bureau in the U.K., I was horrified, but not surprised to read of the large number of former Woolworth’s workers who will be dumped without a penny of redundancy cash, unless someone puts very necessary measures in place.
Quite rightly, redundant workers in the U.K. have some small measure of protection laid down in statute. This protection is modest, but in the event of the loss of a job, it MAY go some way toward housing and feeding a family in the interim period between losing a job and gaining new employment.
Go on, Jersey – do the right thing, protect your workforce!
Report abuse
Everyone knows what should be done. The States have decided in their ‘wisdom’ to postpone the debate on the issue. For good. Whenever there has been a controversy their heads get stuck firmly in the sand till the situation goes away. This ignorant behaviour is unacceptable and sadly indicative of how the Island operates. The ‘I’m alright Jack’ attitude stinks of the Eighties. The Thatcher era is long gone and the Assembly need to wake up to this.
Report abuse