Airlines charging for excess baggage is such an unfair system
Monday 9th February 2009, 3:00PM GMT.
From R McCredie.
QUEUEING to check in at Jersey Airport recently, my observations were maddening.
First to check in was a young lady who would weigh at most eight stone when wet. She was (confirmed to me later) charged over £20 because her suitcase was a few kilos overweight.
Next, a person to whom I shall refer affectionately, with no malice, as an original character (who ate all the pies), well north of 18 stone. He suffered no extra charges and shuffled off.
I make the point that the combined weight of the young girl and her slightly overweight suitcase would not come close to the weight of ‘pieman’ and his luggage. The unfairness of it all!
We are informed that the most fuel used by an aircraft is on take-off, the amount used being determined by the total weight of the aircraft itself, the passengers and the baggage.
Bearing in mind that some passengers use only hand luggage and others have well-under-weight suitcases, I feel that no passenger should be charged if only in possession of one suitcase, as the baggage situation levels itself out.
The young lady in question was charged extra because she violated a self-imposed weight limit set by the airline (which can be lowered at any time) simply as a way to extort money from the passenger. Equally, to charge anyone for payment by debit card is sad, as this type of payment is immediate.
Our locally founded airline, Flybe, were the first airline in Britain to impose a baggage charge, and it has steadily increased to £7.99 a bag, per leg, per journey, while the cost of fuel has rapidly decreased. Flybe also announced the healthiest profit of any other UK airline in the last 12 months. No surprise there, then.
Is it too cynical, even for me, to suggest that Flybe, the favoured airline, have a vision of one day enjoying similar competition to that facing Condor Ferries at the moment?
The contagious greed in this Island, a rampant sickness, ranging from house prices (kept artificially high) to supermarkets, airlines and ferries is well outside a printable description.
5 Tunnell Street,
St Helier.
The Queen's Diamond Jubilee
JEP Jubilee Editions
Saturday 2 June: Guide to Celebrations
Wednesday 6 June: Souvenir of Events
View The Queen in Jersey supplement
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
Well said R McCredie- I used to have the same thoughts when our petite daughter was travelling back and forth from university trying not to have excess baggage (which is difficult with books,coursework etc etc) One would have hoped that airline staff would adopt a bit of common sense in such matters and not follow the book to the letter but they are probably instructed to get every penny they can out of the travelling public!
Report abuse
Good letter Mr/Mrs McCredie! The other bug bear I have is that often there is no extra charge for golf clubs, but other sports equipment such as scuba diving gear, surf boards etc. do not count.
Try going on a diving holiday for 2 weeks and keeping your luggage under 20kg!
Having said that, some airlines use dicretion and I have been able to negotiate a lower rate, or in some cases talk myself out of being charged completely when my luggage has been over.
Unfortunately Flybe do not fall in the catogory of reasonable. Paying for luggage regardless of how light it is is deplorable and I only use BA now for travel on and off the island.
Report abuse
Tell me about it! I have just spent hours packing, weighing our suitcases and what really gets me is where is the extra allowance for my 2 year old who is as light as a feather! She is probably offsetting the man who ate all the pies. Total greed on the behalf of the company – anything to get some extra money these days.
Report abuse
I could not believe how the airlines can get away with this , I have never been charged I only book on site that have the fares inclusive of all fees and it allways works out cheaper skyscanner or skydeals skyeurope I mostly travel with either bmi or ba
Report abuse
As an average-height, thin person I have to agree. My husband is 6’4″ but thin, he is often made to pay for ‘extra leg room’ yet other body types are not allowed to be discriminated against. On a short flight he would happily take a ‘normal’ seat but his experience is that he ends up next to an obese person who ‘eats’ further into the little leg room he already has causing him painful leg cramps!
Last time I flew I was 0.5kg over the allowance, I was asked if I could move anything from my hold luggage into my cabin luggage, to which my response was ‘it will still be going on the same plane!’
I understand the need to be able to balance weight on a plane but these charges are not logical or in any way defensible they are simply a money maker.
I don’t agree with any type of discrimination but if airlines are allowed to discriminate against one body type (tall people) they must surely be allowed to discriminate against all!
Report abuse
Admittedly when I first moved to Jersey I always tried to book FlyBe but quickly found that it always ended up cheaper with BA (or the now gone BMI).
Even if BA was £10 more expensive to be able to arrive at Gatwick at Gate 55 and stay there (not going out and back through security) to get my next flight out was a hassle-free trip well worth the extra money.
Report abuse