Why this minister should go
Friday 20th March 2009, 3:00PM GMT.
HEALTH Minister Jim Perchard has no doubt been engaged in some very serious thinking about his position since he admitted lying in the States, directing abusive language at a fellow States Member and telling that same Member to ‘slit his wrists’.
Unfortunately for Senator Perchard – and irrespective of any conclusions to the contrary that he might have reached – he is faced with only one honourable course of action: he should resign.
The Senator might plead that he is by no means the first person to have misled the States through a knee-jerk falsehood. He might also say that the intemperate language that he used amounted to a spur-of-the-moment indiscretion.
He cannot, however, entertain the faintest hope of convincing anyone inside or outside the House that advising Senator Stuart Syvret to make a suicide attempt was acceptable behaviour for any minister. That he is Health Minster is not only ironic but also compounds the offence considerably.
Senator Perchard must also recognise the contribution his conduct has made to bringing the States further into disrepute at a time when the Assembly’s reputation is anything but high. If he can find it within himself to fall honourably on his sword he would at least do something to restore faith in our parliament. He would also help to restore his damaged personal standing – albeit at the cost of relinquishing power.
But there is another side to this lamentable story that neither the public nor States Members can possibly ignore. Senator Perchard’s outbursts were beyond the pale, but so was the outrageous and prolonged conduct that provoked them.
The incessant, unprincipled, unsupported and most certainly unparliamentary attacks that Senator Syvret makes not only on colleagues in the States but also on civil servants, journalists and more or less anyone with the temerity to disagree with his view of life clearly tried Senator Perchard’s patience until his temper snapped. Even if this mitigation is not enough to save a ministerial skin, it puts the whole tragi-comic episode into its full context.
Meanwhile, other senior States Members seem to be determined to turn a blind eye to this whole unseemly affair. Chief Minister Terry Le Sueur has, unaccountably, said that, as far as he is concerned, it is now a thing of the past, whereas, at the very least, he should have referred it to Privileges and Procedures.
More appropriately, he should by now have demonstrated the leadership that the Island requires of him by making it clear to Senator Perchard that he had stepped over the boundary of acceptable ministerial conduct and that it was time to go.
The Queen's Diamond Jubilee
JEP Jubilee Editions
Saturday 2 June: Guide to Celebrations
Wednesday 6 June: Souvenir of Events
View The Queen in Jersey supplement
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
Congratulations on this opinion column! You have said what so many people feel.
Report abuse
This editorial has passed that thin finite line of the impartiality of the press.
It is not up to the JEP to pass judgment. But they have done precisely that today.The editorial, “Why this minister should go” is peppered with comments,such as “The Senator might plead that he is by no means the first person to have misled the States through a knee-jerk falsehood”.Look at Syvret’s unhinged blog for undiluted poison against the JEP, the “rag” and every decent person in Jersey’s government. Another quote, “He would also help to restore his damaged personal standing –albeit at the cost of relinquishing power”.So the JEP is demanding the resignation of a minister? That is not the role of a newspaper, let alone one that has a monopoly in this small island, that shortly faces economic oblivion in the coming months through the G20 summit proposals.Time that Jersey and its only newspaper woke up to this far greater threat, rather than a purile ill mannered spat in the States.
Competing interests. None.
I do not know and have never spoken to, nor have been in email contact or letter with Senator Perchard or Senator Syvret.
Report abuse
Thank you JEP,
I think you have truly caught the feeling of the people.
You are absolutely correct in your assessment, Jim Perchard should go, he has shown he has no empathy with some of the most vulnerable people of society who are easily scapegoated and for whose health he is responsible. He lied, therefore he is no longer trustworthy in anything he says, and he is a bully.
Is this really the person we want to have in charge of our health service?
If he lied about this, what else is he covering up?
How long can the health service be allowed to limp on?
TLS surely must realise that he has completely misread what the electorate want i.e leadership from its most senior politicians – Perchard must go!
Report abuse