Tax: The saga continues
Wednesday 15th April 2009, 3:00PM BST.
WHEN, after the recent G20 summit, it became clear that Jersey was on the offshore centre ‘white list’ and was therefore not classified as a tax haven, there was considerable relief and a certain amount of celebration.
In spite of this, finance industry professionals, commentators and at least some politicians were all too well aware that our privileged position on the list was not going to be the end of the story.
Sure enough, at the end of last week a strongly worded letter sent by UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown to our Chief Minister, Senator Terry Le Sueur, opened a new chapter in the saga of taxation and Britain’s Crown dependencies.
In the past, the word ‘evasion’ was taboo in the world of tax minimisation. Mr Brown has now made it quite clear that ‘avoidance’ — which has always been regarded as legitimate — is now in the government’s sights.
He has also made it clear that the G20 process and the OECD lists were merely a beginning and that ‘genuine progress’ would be expected, particularly in terms of tax transparency.
In common with Guernsey and the Isle of Man, Jersey has little choice but to sit up and take notice of what is now being said and, implicitly, threatened. Confrontation is unlikely to produce anything but a very unequal struggle against the might of Westminster and Whitehall, with consequent grave danger to our principal source of income.
That, however, is the pessimistic interpretation of our situation. It can be balanced by a range of obvious truths about our conduct so far on the tax transparency front. The Tax Information Exchange Agreements that our authorities have already signed show that we are earnest about openness. In addition, our regulatory regime is demonstrably robust and has won praise from international agencies fighting tax evasion and other forms of financial crime.
It is, meanwhile, very much to be hoped that Mr Brown, his advisers and UK MPs who are particularly evangelical when it comes to tax matters realise just how dependent the Crown dependencies are on financial services.
It is essential that every effort is made to drive home the message that abrupt action aimed at hamstringing offshore finance would very quickly ruin us, render a great many British citizens destitute, and simultaneously inflict considerable damage on the City of London.
The Queen's Diamond Jubilee
JEP Jubilee Editions
Saturday 2 June: Guide to Celebrations
Wednesday 6 June: Souvenir of Events
View The Queen in Jersey supplement
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
What people should remember is that Britain is now in the EU and one country of 27 at present this figure will only rise with time as new members join.
What happens if the EU as a whole (except for Britain) says enough is enough? To me this would mean all British finance centres whether on, or off shore, would face being closed down. So this decision could even be out of British hands. Does Britain have a veto to block this or not?
If this is the case, then an option to keep the status quo would be for Britain to withdraw from the EU. Does anyone think Britain would take this course of action with the resultant chaos and costs it would entail?
Another option would be for Jersey to become independent of the UK. Would this be the reason why there has been some talk of Jersey becoming independent from the UK?
If this does happen then what happens if the EU put an embargo on Jersey and others because they don’t want offshore finance centres off of their coast?
Report abuse