A minister falls on his sword
Thursday 16th April 2009, 3:00PM BST.
HE might have spent quite a long time wrestling with his conscience and the realities of his situation, but Senator Jim Perchard has finally decided on the honourable course of action and has offered his resignation from the post of Health Minister.
As many Islanders realised from the outset, Senator Perchard’s position became untenable when it emerged that he had urged a fellow States Member to commit suicide.
Such a suggestion would be unacceptable on the lips of any politician, but it was utterly beyond the pale from a man whose position in public life — which carried responsibility for social services as well as health — demanded the highest levels of sensitivity and empathy.
However, the Senator is a man much sinned against as well as sinning. It has become all too apparent that his abusive conduct was provoked by a barrage of insult, allegation and defamation directed not only at him personally but also at staff for whom he quite rightly felt responsibility.
That one man has fallen on his sword while another, Senator Stuart Syvret, the source of provocation through his own torrents of immoderate abuse published on the internet, should escape censure manifestly lacks balance.
But now is a time for looking forward rather than towards the sordid events of recent weeks. A new Health Minister must be elected who is capable of meeting the challenges of a department that is in danger of becoming the poisoned chalice of the public sector.
As well as building morale in the wake of scandals that have rocked the service, the new minister will have to ensure that standards are maintained, or ideally improved, in the face of increasing pressures on funding. He or she will also have to develop strategies for coping with medical care which, thanks to scientific and technological advances, is becoming ever more complex and expensive.
Meanwhile, the accession of a new minister to the executive might offer the Council of Ministers a chance to take stock, tighten the rigging on the ship of state, and sail on into calmer waters.
Turbulent events which could not have been foreseen have played their part in making the Council’s task a difficult one since it took control, but it is time that its members backed up their frequent assertions that they know exactly where they are going with convincing evidence of competence across the board.
The Queen's Diamond Jubilee
JEP Jubilee Editions
Saturday 2 June: Guide to Celebrations
Wednesday 6 June: Souvenir of Events
View The Queen in Jersey supplement
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
A matter of conscience … nah …he spent a long time canvassing support from his fellow politicians and resigned when he realised that he was going to lose the confidence vote. A pragmatic descision … conscience does not come into it… he never said anything to indicate he was resigning on a matter of conscience… you said that. His hand was forced.
Report abuse
This whole episode reminds me of the scene near the end of The Bridge On The River Kwai when the colonel finally falls on the detonator to end it all.
It would be nice for a change not to have one other person brought in to every story as if he is responsible for everything over here. I believe people are getting a bit bored with this now.
The fact of the matter is somebody in government was very rude to someone else and denied it, before finally admitting yes he had said something like that, only because others either heard him or he was on tape saying the very words he denied previously. This government appears to be tottering from one disaster to another. What is next on the conveyeur belt I ask?
Indeed I find it amazing that people keep making excuses for this sort of behaviour. In plain English this sort of behaviour is wrong regardless of any perceived provocation. End of.
Report abuse
Agree with 1 and 2. I cannot understand why this paper always has to justify someone’s actions if Stuart Syvret is involved. Mr Perchard is a grown man, politics are cut and thrust and his words and behaviour were wrong, regardless.
No conscience involved in his resignation, just an easy way out of humiliation. If conscience were involved he would have resigned straight away rather than squirm, wheedle and blame at every opportunity.
Two wrongs do not make a right and if Mr Perchard were a man of stature he could choose to ignore what he perceives as provocation. Please leave Stuart Syvret out of the equation this time.
Report abuse
Stop making excuses for Perchard’s behaviour. He was abusive toward another States member (it doesn’t matter who that other person was), lied about it in the States (which in my opinion was the biggest sin of all) and resigned because he knew he had no option other than to face a losing vote of no confidence. Yes he fell on his sword but it was he and he alone who caused his own downfall!
Report abuse
I agree, too many excuses, and finally, when his own so called provocation, which drove him for the second time to utter those fateful words, wasn’t enough to get him off the hook, suddenly it’s his staff he’s stating are the victims!
The poor man, you can tell he was a farmer, I’m sure he’s used to having a few tons of straw bales lying around to clutch at. Enough please.
He was and is the one in the wrong, both times, he swore, he said those words, he lied about it all, he gave a constipated half apology, not even personally to Stuart, and blamed him at every opportunity whilst still squirming.
Let’s hope the next Health Minister will get an outside enquiry done at the hospital which will lay the blame for peoples deaths at someones door, otherwise a bit pointless, no?
Report abuse
Nothing decent or honourable about it.
Jim Perchard resigned because the alternative was a humiliating vote of no confidence that would have forced him from office and left the CoM staggering.
Plenty more disasters of their own making await the CoM.
The Esplanade Quarter has definite potential!
Report abuse
The Esplande Quarter has already started and yet I didn’t think it had been given the green light? Who decided this and when?
I think he only went when he saw that he was going to be made to look completely stupid in losing the vote that was brought against him.
I myself would have prefered him to have stayed to the bitter end. Why walk out half way through? I was looking forward to the states debate on it. I was hoping for the CoM to be shown up yet again by their support of him.
Report abuse