Charity begins … not by helping the law-breakers

Thursday 18th June 2009, 3:00PM BST.

I WAS at a loss for words on hearing that the Jersey Democratic Alliance had started a fund to pay the fines and legal costs of Deputies Geoff Southern and Shona Pitman.

Those who don’t wish to fall foul of the law should not break the law, no matter how unfair it may be. There are appropriate channels and methods in which laws can be altered, if the public and political will supports change, so those who choose ‘martyrdom’ have to face the consequences of their actions.

No doubt there are Islanders who will donate their hard-earned cash to the JDA’s fund, including many who in the current recession cannot really afford to do so. They will give because they believe Deputies Southern and Pitman to be champions of the oppressed and the needy who persistently snap at the heels of the establishment and an ‘out-of-touch’ Council of Ministers.

To describe their punishment as ‘punitive and disproportionate’ is a gross exaggeration. What appals me more is that they have yet to be disciplined by their peers in the Laughter Factory – though for some among our band of beloved politicians it could well be a case of ‘There but for the grace of God go I’.

I can think of a million more deserving causes to give money to than two politicians who chose to ignore the rules governing the democratic voting system and got caught. A far better example of serving the community and putting the interest of the less fortunate before self came last week – not from any of the politicians paid a princely sum to rule over us mere mortals, but from a nine-year-old girl.

Exhibiting altruism far beyond her years, Kristina Sokic told her family and friends that instead of buying her gifts or slipping a tenner in a greetings card for her birthday, they should make a donation to a charity of her choice.

Kristina chose Autism Jersey because she has a cousin in Canada who suffers from the condition, and she wanted to help other sufferers. Her selflessness raised £140 and reinforced the ideal that it is better to give than to receive.

This Island has a long and strong tradition of service to the community and supporting charitable causes. Most people give what they can afford to deserving causes in donations to appeals, monthly standing orders or the benefit of their labour if they believe in a cause.

Never has the proverb ‘Charity begins at home’ ever stopped this little yet ever expanding Island raising money for any number of worthy and charitable causes, and in a variety of ways.
We respond immediately to natural disasters such as the Boxing Day tsunami in 2005 and the recent Italian earthquake, and year in, year out hundreds of Islanders undertake projects in the Third World.

In addition we regularly walk, run, cycle, push beds and even jump out of planes (securely attached to a parachute, of course) to raise funds. If there’s a worthwhile cause, Jersey folk will support it tirelessly and in good cheer.

Notwithstanding human nature’s selfless desire to help those in need, the success of charities does relieve governments of the necessity to provide essential public services – hospices being a prime example. While charities such as Jersey Hospice Care exist thanks to public donations and the generosity of society, there is no need for local health authorities to provide specialist palliative nursing services out of the public purse. This is no bad thing for the taxpayer and governments already overburdened with bureaucracy.

While the well-known national and local charities put their resources to good effect to maintain the necessary income stream, it is the lesser-known but equally worthwhile charities that get overshadowed by the sheer scale of numbers. How many of us who queue in the Royal Square every December at the annual soup kitchen in aid of the Shelter Trust give that charity a second thought throughout the year? Probably not a lot, unless helping the homeless and those who have fallen off society’s radar is a cause true to their heart.

I do not want to criticise those who give no more than the price of a cup of soup to the Shelter Trust, because that is enough, and it is better than giving nothing at all. We give what we can, when we can and to causes that touch us as individuals.

A glance down the extensive list of more than 200 members of the Association of Jersey Charities reveals an amazing variety of good causes for a rock the dimension of just 45 square miles or so. All are non-profit organisations whose purpose is to raise funds for the good of the community. A fortunate few have a head start by being grant-aided, but in the main local charities rely on the generosity of us Islanders and the business community and each person’s own ingenuity to generate income.

Whether we choose to support an African or a Jersey child rather than adults whose lives have been changed for the worse by a head injury or a stroke, or spend weekends removing non-indigenous plants from headlands instead of buying a new slate for the roof of the Société Jersiaise’s chapel at La Hougue Bie, each to their own personal choice.

When it comes to parting with hard-earned cash, there is a limit to salving even the most generous conscience. Making a donation and seeing how that money is put to good effect – and, moreover, knowing that that gift is making a real difference to someone’s life – is reason enough to dig deep into our pockets.

We can’t all be as truly selfless and altruistic as Kristina Sokic, but this Island is a much richer place because of her and others who lead by example. Contributing to the JDA’s fund to help errant politicians to pay for their misdemeanors doesn’t even register on most people’s radar.


  1. 1
    Scott

    WOW!!!
    And I mean WOW!!!
    What a pointless and one sided column.

    Instead of pointing the finger of blame at Deputies Geoff Southern and Shona Pitman, why not look at what they where trying to do….

    Yes Jersey has a long and strong tradition of service to the community and supporting charitable causes which is exactly what the deputies where trying to fulfil.
    By using the charity line you are trying to make your column sound righteous but have you failed by missing the point completely.
    All the deputies did was to help members of the community to apply for a voting form as they are unable through disability age and lack of mobility to head to a voting station themselves.
    They did not get a voting form and fill it in for the person to add votes to themselves they just helped them have the capability to vote as is their given right.
    If you really want to write a column about continuing jerseys long and strong tradition of service to the community and supporting charitable causes.
    How about writing in your column asking if the law that the deputies broke is fair and just?
    Write the information in your column explaining when the law the deputies broke was passed so we can see how old that law is?
    Or maybe use your contacts in the JEP to get them to issue a postal voting form with every copy of the JEP so the people of jersey who are unable to go to a voting station are able to vote…….

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Nellie Macon

    Totally agree Scott.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Julie

    This view is right because there are much more deserving causes than the JDA “please pay our fines for us” fund. Its actually incredibly cheeky if you ask most people. If Southern and Pitman cannot afford to pay the court maybe they could get a loan from a wealthy islander? Or has that bridge already broken?

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Adrian

    Yet more pro-establishment waffle as far as I am concerned. It would be better to at least make an effort to be pretend to be unbiased as far as I am concerned.

    I see a constant theme here now. Anything negative as per Senator Syvret, Lenny Harper, and the JDA and it gets the full monty.

    Anything bad about the establishment figures and a positive spin is put on it. People aren’t daft.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Hautlieu Liberal

    Who exactly is this columnist? Do we really have to put up with such biased, one-sided tosh?

    It is totally absurd to equate the JDA appeal to a charity. Anyone giving them money does so as a political contribution, you know Paula, just like all those big corporations do to political parties throughout the democratic world, and the JDA is a legally constituted party.

    Really, editors, such poor writing, poor research and absurd conclusions.

    Perhaps you could find some column inches for a more liberal, pluralistic view – at least on one of those increasingly rare occasions when you try to find a modicum of balance and fair play.

    Report abuse