Credit ‘harder to come by’

Monday 13th July 2009, 3:00PM BST.

Chamber of Commerce president Ray Shead

Chamber of Commerce president Ray Shead

OVER a third of local businesses say that credit is harder to come by.

According to the latest Jersey Chamber of Commerce confidence survey, 36% of respondents say that credit is harder to access than it was six months ago. Around a quarter of Chamber members are represented in the survey, which was carried out in June.

The members were also asked whether the terms of any overdraft facility had changed within the last six months, for instance requiring higher interest rates or with a reduced limit. Half said they did not have an overdraft, 36% said it had remained the same and eight per cent said terms had become tighter.

Businesses were also asked whether customers were taking longer to pay invoices. Around 30% said it was taking customers longer to pay amounts due. Around eight per cent of the respondents said it was now taking them longer to pay their suppliers.

Asked about wages, 36% said the wage increases given to staff will be smaller than last year. Another 39% said that wages will remain unchanged and 16% expect to reduce the overall wage bill.

Chamber president Ray Shead said: ‘I would like to thank members for taking the time once again to complete this survey – collectively Chamber members employ close to 20,000 people, so this is important guidance as to the current state of the local economy.’


Read the full story in the Jersey Evening Post.

Click here for subscription details.

Individual editions are also available online.


  1. 1
    Nick

    This is highlighting the effect the collapse of old fashioned “high street” banking is having, and the fact that the UK Government’s “Quantative Easing” policy is flawed because without the Banks putting the spending power in the pocket of the individual consumer (achieved by being much more responsive to debt consolidation scenario’s for individuals)businesses are not going to recover quickly, and in fact some otherwise sound businesses will go under whilst others which should do so will receive a wholly undeserved lifeline.
    By putting the accent of it’s “easing scheme” on corporate and business clients of the Bank’s the UK government scheme by-passes the individual consumer who is the grass root customer in the marketplace. By doing that you remove the market force which determines which is a good sound business and which is a business which should go under! Harsh but I’m afraid a basic law of economics.
    Instead you are relying under the UK government’s scheme on the Bank’s choosing which businesses to support based on their impression of what is a “good business”, a suspect judgement process which was surely responsible for this crisis in the first place!

    Report abuse