Cutbacks that shock the public

Thursday 23rd July 2009, 3:00PM BST.

THE States Business Plan for next year, which was published earlier this week, made it clear not only that the Island is facing difficult times but also that government feels compelled to respond by making public sector cuts. Just how deeply those cuts are likely to bite is now becoming clearer.

However, it is unlikely that many Islanders will have guessed that the first round of economies to cause a stir would have involved health services, but that is how matters stand.

To be fair, the way in which legitimately concerned staff have flagged up the service cut issues will have thrust it into the spotlight, but the fact that health – long considered to be the sacrosanct service – should be subject to potentially damaging economies must come as something of a shock.

The most prominent proposed cutback concerns Patient Transport Services, the system which takes many elderly people to day centres and clinics. In the view of a leading paramedic, if the plan is put into action, lives could be at risk.

Meanwhile, other economies are likely to involve grants to Acet, the Aids charity, and a special-needs respite home, Maison Allo. And there is even a possibility that charges will have to be levied from patients in the General Hospital’s Accident and Emergency department to balance the budget.

Against the background of the savings that government must undoubtedly make to meet the challenges of the next few years these cuts are quite disturbing enough, but a further factor moves them into an entirely new category of concern.

By the Health department’s own admission, some retrenchment is necessary because of the large sums spent as a consequence of senior staff suspensions. In other words, cuts in valuable services are, at least in part, being driven by expenditure that, from the point of view of the public good, has achieved nothing.

Warnings are scattered throughout the 108 pages of the new Business Plan, but it is a document that few will read. Consequently, the emergence of health as a service area to be threatened by job losses has all the makings of a public relations disaster. It will be instructive to see how politicians deal with this.

Islanders will have to get used to the idea that serious problems require extreme remedies, but they will take some convincing that health – or, indeed, education – belong anywhere near the top of the savings programme list.


  1. 1
    Nellie Macon

    Savings could easily be made in Health by getting rid of some of the senior management – the Health Department seems to have far too many chiefs and not enough indians. Much of the work appears to be duplicated within various departments where senior management have been steadily building themselves little empires over the years. A good pruning would save the taxpayer many thousands anually and retain our precious services.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Hautlieu Liberal

    Do I detect some vestiges of social conscience in this editorial? Is there some realization that the unjust economic and political direction you have so enthusiastically supported is now showing its true colours?

    Quite simply, when cuts are needed the worse off will always suffer more. No government like this one is going tax those who can really afford it in order to increase revenue. Those who need help will get less, all to protect what Chomsky calls “social security for the rich.”

    The grave concerns many have about the lack of transparency in government and our deficient political and legal institutions have been consistently denigrated and vilified by those in power.

    The JEP has shown little sense of balance and fair play; it bores us with timid reporting and a constant drip of dull and self-righteous columnists. Please, you have the power. Don’t continue to misuse it.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Darren Le Geyt

    2. The JEP is establishment and will never change its tune. You as a young pretender is what Jersey needs. Go for it.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Adrian

    Nothing can shock me I’m afraid as it is all too predictable. This governemnt thinks it is right to tax the middle earners the most and give money to those at the bottom end and give tax breaks to those at the top, no wonder it is failing.

    Anyone with half a brain knows you tax according to earnings, and you get everyone contributing, there is now no longer any sack in the system for free lunches or discounts for anyone.

    I would say that any who feel they shouldn’t be paying at 20 means 20 who are able to then they should go elsewhere and take their money with them. Far better to have proper contributions from everyone able to pay than giving some an easier ride in my honest opinion, because they MIGHT THREATEN TO LEAVE.

    You never know some of these people might stay and pay the tax rather than risk an uncertain future in some tin pot tax haven with little stability. It is definately got to be worth trying.

    Report abuse

KIT 4 CLUBS

Win a share of £10,000 Win a share of £10,000

2012 is the year of the London Olympics and to celebrate this great event the Jersey Evening Post, in association with sponsors Ogier is giving all sporting clubs a chance to win a share of £10,000.