Let the jury decide

Saturday 25th July 2009, 2:58PM BST.

From Christopher Clancy.
COULD I just briefly reply to Helier Clement?

My comments were based solely on past reports from the JEP. Can he deny that the former deputy head of Jersey police has a very creditable and proud record of police service over many years, as also the currently suspended police chief? It would appear that he claims that these persons would submit files of evidence without having concluded that they provide sufficient evidence to proceed with a case in front of a judge and jury.

Discussions had been held with other legal advisers regarding whether or not to proceed with the case and these had concurred with the police. It would appear that at this very early stage of the proceedings only a person at the top decided that the cases should be looked into further and thus began a very long process.

Opinions abound about this very unsatisfactory situation, and the best way to settle the matter would have been to allow it to proceed to trial. Thus the people who have been tainted with innuendo would have been cleared and could go away and hold their heads up high and those who seek justice would have had their day also.

If appealing for a court hearing and letting a judge and jury decide on the facts presented is calling for mob rule, as Helier Clement suggests, then I and many others are guilty. I would not suggest that he has been sipping at the apple brandy about which he so often writes, but I do think that he is not upholding the adage, which I repeat, ‘Justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done’.


  1. 1
    Nick

    Once again I suspect the problems here come from expecting too much in relation to the finance and resources available on a small Island. One of the problems of employing former UK senior civil servants(And I am not talking about police officers at this point)and parachuting them into positions of authority in the Island, is that they bring with them a management mentality wholly geared up to a much larger infrastructure than is in situ on Island. The only time this problem is highlighted is in situations like the Haut la Garenne investigations last year,when the International Press and a number of unscrupulous individuals with their own agendas managed to whip up such a storm in such a short period of time, at the expence of those with real issues, that the only answer available to those in authority was to hurl money at the situation in the hope this would demonstrate that the situation was under control!All this exploded around our local police force at a period when they were trying to conduct a sensitive and serious enquiry about events that in most instances happened over 30 years ago. It is hardly surprising therefore that some serious archeology seemed to be necessary to try and find evidence to support the various allegations being made.Also the costs of bringing in “Experts” from outside the Island to assist, impossible to estimate in such an open ended situation,were bound to run away with those responsible for trying to control the situation.We are now in a situation where we are about to embark on yet another expensive investigation (Dare I say Witch-hunt)commencing with keeping an expensive public employee on suspension on full pay whilst this unproductive nonsense proceeds.
    I have a number of questions for those seriously embarking on this unproductive exercise:
    1) What is it ultimately going to achieve?
    2) Is it going to make the Island’s Police force any more capable of handling such a situation in the future?
    3)Would it not be better to spend any money available for such a witch-hunt on improving Police administration (staffing levels,systems and training etc.)instead?
    4)Is this not just another exercise in scape-goating at the taxpayer’s expense?
    More important and much more effective I would have thought would be to pursue some of those who made a point of sticking their noses in and stirring things into a barely controllable frenzy,whilst occupying a supremely hypocritical position themselves(e.g.two labour politicians who became extremely vocal over our problems here, but who have remained curiously silent on much publisised and arguably more serious events closer to home?)
    And as to our imported top civil servants, please try to remember that in your previous role in which ever UK town or city you rose to prominence,you were able to rely on a huge supporting infrastructure, as were any public employees under your control, the same is not true here in Jersey which in population terms is no larger than a small district in a major UK city! It is not anybody’s fault if a situation suddenly develops on a scale well beyond the capabilities of local services to cope.What is somebody’s fault is stirring things up to such a pitch wholly unjustifiably!

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Nathan Jordan

    I have nothing to add Christopher and Nick, you’re both quite right, it seems that a fair trial isn’t a priority for some people in this island. N.

    Report abuse

KIT 4 CLUBS

Win a share of £10,000 Win a share of £10,000

2012 is the year of the London Olympics and to celebrate this great event the Jersey Evening Post, in association with sponsors Ogier is giving all sporting clubs a chance to win a share of £10,000.