Cutting trees just doesn’t make sense
Thursday 10th December 2009, 3:00PM GMT.
From Terry Thuillier.
WHAT a sad state of affairs when the Jersey Trees for Life group are denied their £20,000 funding for next year (JEP, 00 December).
It is appreciated that in the present economic climate certain cuts in States expenditure are inevitable. However, when a charity who are doing such good and essential work in improving our future landscape by planting trees, etc, is singled out in this way, it is deeply concerning.
When everyone is talking about climate change and the environment, we should be actively encouraging the planting of trees and this particular cut is totally inappropriate and not thought through.
In some ways it is a soft target and reminds me of the time when the late Deputy Norman Le Brocq had his grant for the repair of roadside walls quashed in order to save a few pounds, only this is far worse.
I understand that the Trees for Life group has planted some 9,000 trees and shrubs this year and are to be congratulated and thanked on a remarkable achievement.
In terms of cost effectiveness for our future environment and landscape, I cannot imagine a better example. This money must be found, as it is very discouraging for all concerned and sends out the wrong message.
The Queen's Diamond Jubilee
JEP Jubilee Editions
Saturday 2 June: Guide to Celebrations
Wednesday 6 June: Souvenir of Events
View The Queen in Jersey supplement
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
In an age of carbon awareness, does it make any sense to cut down and to import perfectly good fir trees to the Island – just to satisfy the observance of an atavistic and heathen winter solstice custom?
Just how much carbon will NOT be absorbed because of the destruction of thousands of these trees?
Report abuse