More recycling? Let’s have some answers first
Thursday 10th December 2009, 2:59PM GMT.
From Keith Shaw.
THE St Helier parish assembly on 25 November was well attended, possibly prompted by reported claims that there was only a 19% take up rate for the Havre des Pas trial recycling scheme.
For many, it was their first chance to explain how recycling concerned them and how it would not work in their back yards, hallways or landings. Care workers, landlords and refuse collectors supported these comments.
No one spoke in support of the trial recycling scheme as a model for the rest of St Helier, yet many, including the Constable, spoke in favour of a more efficient, centralised Island-wide system, as seen in operation in the UK.
That plant didn’t need kerbside sorting or specialist collection vehicles, being simpler and cheaper to operate, saving ratepayers’ money being spent on new plant, vehicles, storage sheds and staff, etc. It is also a safer, cleaner and efficient way to deal with the mixed loads from Euro bins.
Ratepayers raised serious concerns about the parish going it alone, which included building specialist sheds and buying its own plant and equipment. Would the potential income ever cover the actual costs?
The meeting recorded several notable outcomes, confirmed by the Constable:
• Consultation on recycling will start immediately.
• No one will be forced to recycle at their doorstep, nor be penalised in any way for failing to do so.
• Refuse staff will not be forced to take part in recycling processes.
• Food waste will not be composted.
The French buyer for our paper and cardboard was mentioned again, as well as ships and containers leaving the Island empty, which could carry our recycled goods for free.
As we haven’t seen any euros or pounds yet, or any of these money-making schemes materialise, are these dreams ever going to happen?
We must be realistic. In five to ten years time, will we have similar volumes of newspapers, cardboard or glass containers? These potential markets could disappear faster than tourists.
The greatest Island impact will inevitably come from reducing the use of items and changing how we do things. The assembly was reminded how local shops reduced plastic bag use from 15 million to 500,000 a year.
Existing methods and procedures need examining for efficiency and environmental savings. For example:
• Why are we stockpiling thousands of old TV sets? If they have valuable parts, sell them.
• Why are we told to wash glass bottles and food containers with expensive drinking
water, before crushing them? There is surplus water at Bellozanne.
• What is the real cost of producing compost at La Collette?
• What’s the real cost per Mw of electricity from the Bellozanne Plant?
The Queen's Diamond Jubilee
JEP Jubilee Editions
Saturday 2 June: Guide to Celebrations
Wednesday 6 June: Souvenir of Events
View The Queen in Jersey supplement
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
Recycling is essentially a feel good solution for those of us who consume items that cannot be consigned to the garden compost bin, that is if one has one. It is a green tree huggers excuse for over consumsumsion.
I used to be considered as a Jerseyman, my father, grandfather anf great grandfather were born in Jersey. Last time I went to Jersey a young Scottish Customs lass told me I was no longer really welcome. Perhaps I should not comment.
We now live on a island about the size of Jersey but with only 2000 or so residents in winter. We have recycling, but lately the plastics and cans are crushed together. Our main aim in recycling is to reduce the quantity of garbage going into the landfill. We do not know what happens to the recycled material but at least it makes us feel better.
Perhaps with the new state of art incinereator it might be better to burn it, get the elecricity and pretend one is doing the right thing.
We will be returning to Jersey next fall to celebrate our golden anniversary, we are looking forward to seeing the iconic archicture along the coasts of which all residents must be proud.
Sorry about the spelling and grammer, I went to the same school as the Chief Minister but then he is a younger lad.
Report abuse
Not everything suitable for recycling is suitable for the compost heap, as Le Noir implies.
What are we to do with non-organic items? Burning in the Island’s incinerator is definitely not the answer.
Incineration may be a quick and simplistic way of disposing with our rubbish, but it brings with it noxious and poisonous gases, which we are all obliged to inhale.
We all know that using the end product of incineration brings with it even worse problems. Dumping incinerator ash for land reclamation causes the leaching of many chemicals into the soil and from there into the water table.
Only last week this paper reported the fact that Italy is refusing to allow Jersey shellfish into its food chain because of excessive levels of heavy metals. These have undoubtedly come from those substances permeating the sea around our island.
I do not know where Le Noir lives at present, but living away from Jersey – as he readily admits – quite frankly does not give him any licence to tell us what and how to do. Let him keep his advice for his local Congressman or his Senator.
We do not need any more armchair experts here; the States has imported more than enough 1(1)(J) consultants to last us for the next millennium.
Report abuse
“I used to be considered as a Jerseyman, my father, grandfather anf great grandfather were born in Jersey. Last time I went to Jersey a young Scottish Customs lass told me I was no longer really welcome. Perhaps I should not comment”.
No, Le Noir, indeed you should not. It would have been far, far better for you to keep your own counsel and not to offer gratuitous insults.
Jersey would appear to have managed quite nicely since your grandfather abandoned us, and we will continue to do so in the future.
Report abuse