We should pay the UK what we owe them
Friday 18th December 2009, 3:00PM GMT.
From Maurice Boots.
OVER many years a great number of Jersey lives have been saved at no cost to the desperately ill by the reciprocal health agreement Jersey has enjoyed with the UK.
National Health Service care and treatment that was second to none has been given to Islanders which they could not have otherwise received.
In return, Jersey’s hospital has, in general, treated visitors from the UK who fell ill at a cost of £300,000, for which the UK government was charged £3.9 million. The UK authorities have, not surprisingly, found this unacceptable and have decided to discontinue a service vital for many ordinary Jersey residents of moderate means.
As a first step, before any negotiations for the reinstatement of the reciprocal agreement start, our States should immediately return the past overcharges to the UK government, with the profound apologies of all the Islanders on whose behalf they have apparently acted with a complete lack of integrity.
The Queen's Diamond Jubilee
JEP Jubilee Editions
Saturday 2 June: Guide to Celebrations
Wednesday 6 June: Souvenir of Events
View The Queen in Jersey supplement
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
So we have fiddled the UK out of £3.6m p.a. for how many years?
Even without Jersey’s £3.6m per annum fiddle, it is difficult to see any UK government showing any interest in reinstating this agreement. It only affects a few UK people, how many UK residents visit Jersey and are unable to get Travel cover? -a tiny % of the UK population.
Report abuse
“…how many UK residents visit Jersey and are unable to get Travel cover?”
All of those who won’t be booking accomodation, for a start.
Report abuse
Dave, why do you use perjorative words like fiddle. It was a perfectly open and transparent arrangement in which the UK knew they would end up paying more. They have now decided they don’t want to continue. Where is the fiddle in this? Or are you another of the forum users who sacrifices the truth for puerile digs at everybody?
Report abuse
No 3. The arrangement, as I understand it, was that Jersey would charge the UK the cost of treating UK residents who fell ill in Jersey, but Jersey charged the UK approximately thirteen times the cost. How would you describe it?
Report abuse