Stop the point-scoring and get on with the real job

Saturday 30th January 2010, 3:00PM GMT.

From Kevin Keen.
ONE of the downsides of modern democracy is that politicians seem to spend a disproportionate amount of time scoring cheap points against each other.

The recent debates about sandwiches and who should pay for ministers’ BlackBerrys are perfect examples of this kind of time wasting. Occasionally, though, there is an issue which should remind politicians of the real job they were elected to do.

In my opinion the structural deficit of around £50 million per year is just such an issue. Avoiding further tax increases for voters must be something our representatives can all agree on.

Pensioners are suffering from increased living costs and reduced returns on their savings. Middle income families have felt the brunt of the recession in terms of no bonus, no pay rise or even no job and of course 20 means 20.

The lower paid will be struggling even more than usual. Young people are dealing with fewer job opportunities and probably the burden of debt following further education.
If raising taxes is out – and I really hope it is – then politicians will have to do what seems to be their least favourite job, start finding ways to save money rather than spend it.

One of the very few politicians who is trying to do this is Senator Philip Ozouf. He faces a mammoth task, though, not just persuading fellow politicians of the imperative, but also convincing civil servants that the fundamental spending reviews are real. These are not like the numerous other reviews that happen in the States, which often only seem to end up benefiting the consultants carrying them out.

In a business where day-to-day costs exploded from £324 million (in 2000) to getting on for £600 million this year, finding the odd £50 million would be comparatively easy. Of course, as we are often reminded, the States is not a business, clearly evidenced by the difficulty it seems to have in making just about any decision. With wages being the biggest cost, the States, like any employer, will also have to deal with the impacts on hard-working colleagues of cost reductions.

Decisions affecting human beings are never easy, but delaying necessary change is just weak management and long term only makes things worse for everyone.
Islanders who have too much money and don’t mind giving it to the government can do nothing.

For the rest of us, now is the time to get our representatives focussed on the real job in hand – reducing public spending to a sustainable level, rather than just talking about it at the 2011 election when it will all be too late.


  1. 1
    Matt

    Excellent letter Kevin Keen and speaks out for most of the voters without doubt.

    Other wasted time debates I would add are:

    Civil Servant pay increases whilst over 1,000 out of work in the private sector;

    The recent proposal to spend £14,000,000 of tax payers money to buy Pontins;

    The Town Park;

    The Graham Power debacle (as if anybody apart from a handful of Internet Trolls are even interested in this)

    The over turning of the Energy from Waste planet which would of cost us £50,000,000, and I guess there are plenty of others which people can think of that just waste time and do nothing to save us tax payers money.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Jamie

    The only reason people ask questions about Blackberries and sandwiches is because they have not got a clue on how to deal with more technical and important issues like spending. They may as well not be in the States.

    In the next elections I woud like to see more people experienced within the finance industry applying so that at least they will have some grounding in the importance of thrift.

    I doubt anything will change between now and 2011 because the silly question askers have their own agenda.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Michael

    Jamie
    In the next elections I would like to see more people experienced within the finance industry applying so that at least they will have some grounding in the importance of thrift.

    Was it the Banking Industry’s “thrift” that sent us into one the worst recessions in memory?

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Jon H

    As far as I see it there are only two types of people in our Government. Those that use question time to try and dig up non-existent scandal in order to try and de-stabilise the Council of Ministers; and those that genuinely care about the Island and recognise its’ precarious economic situation both present and future.

    You have to ask yourself what is more important to the voters?

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Jamie

    Michael, the recession had nothing to do with Channel Island bankers. Maybe this is part of the problem, the current new people we have in Governemnt do not understand the local finance industry because they have never worked in it?

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Pip Clement

    ‘In the next elections I woud like to see more people experienced within the finance industry applying so that at least they will have some grounding in the importance of thrift.’

    You do not apply to be a member of the States, you stand for election.
    Successful candidates are usually fairly well known and active members of the community that elects them.
    Candidates usually have a range of policies on health, education, etc, a one trick finance industry pony is unlikely to win.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Another Michael

    A great letter.

    As painful as it may be for Civil Servants to accept, the States departments are over staffed and many are over paid. If there is to be cut backs it will affect these people heavily. Unite are very quick to battle that this should not be happening and start making plenty of threats about striking. Unfortunately these departments do need to be run like a business and the staff expenditure greatly outweighs the “profit” that they make (be that monetary or other profit).

    We have to allow for the under achieving employees to be released otherwise it will hit the rest of the island in their pockets.

    It is not a nice situation to be in (I work for JT so am fully aware at the moment) but it is part of life.

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    joker

    Excellent letter

    Matt – agree apart from States workers getting a pay rise, they didn’t (and rightly so).

    Jamie – spot on! May be they should take an aptitude test before entrance. A lot of members are voted in by parishioners based on one or two Parish issues, or were voted in on the back of the popular but flawed anti GST move. Once in the Chamber many do not have a grasp of the bigger picture and complex Island wide issues (you only have to listen to the debates from time to time to be absolutely sure of this). Instead to fill their time and to make it look like they’re politically active, they bicker about sums as little as £2k (Housing Calendar incident). They wait for the COM stance and vote accordingly: If members respect the COM ‘Pour’, if they don’t ‘Contre’. One clear advantage of reducing the number of States members is that individual performance will be much easier to track.

    Another Michael – Ditto. Unfortunately Unions will use even the most tenuous claims to market their services. Their demands, if successful, would pretty much always result in hurting those they claim to protect.

    Report abuse

KIT 4 CLUBS

Win a share of £10,000 Win a share of £10,000

2012 is the year of the London Olympics and to celebrate this great event the Jersey Evening Post, in association with sponsors Ogier is giving all sporting clubs a chance to win a share of £10,000.