Is the work that these civil servants are doing really necessary?

Thursday 11th March 2010, 2:59PM GMT.

From Darius Pearce.
I WAS moved to write by the headline of 8 March: 400 Health jobs ‘in cash crisis threat’.

I had hoped that Senator Ozouf was going to make genuine cuts in public expenditure in response to the ongoing financial crisis, which in truth is caused more by planned increases in government expenditure than anything else.

The figure of £600 million planned spending in 2010 consists of £540 million spent in 2009 and £60 million increase in expenditure. The plan to return to £540 million pounds expenditure is therefore not a cut, but merely a continuance of existing spending.

It is a start, but Jersey spends beyond its means or indeed needs. The burden must fall on the States Assembly to start looking at which legislation is surplus to requirements and begin to repeal laws. This may lead to a loss of employment, but the government should be looking at whether the work that many civil servants do is necessary.

It is clear that many civil service posts exist simply to keep someone off benefits and to justify promotions and higher pay for the upper echelons of the civil service.

The police are a prime example of an over-funded department. Moving plain clothes officers back into uniform, getting them out from behind their desks and putting them on the streets would not only cut expenditure but also fulfil the wishes of the electorate. Reducing the number of sitting States Members by ten per cent would be a good start to any plan.

I hope that Senator Ozouf will achieve his aim and begin to deliver cost-effective services to the people of Jersey. It is possible – Constable Crowcroft has previously achieved this in the Parish of St Helier.


  1. 1
    Toastedteacakes

    A cut in the number of admin staff would be acceptable. Certainly not the nurses, doctors or those who work on their feet.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Blue Knight

    The number of senior officers in the police today is far more than it was when I first joined in 1968. There used to be the Chief Officer, Mr. Axon, a Detective Chief Inspector, Mr. Cockerham and a Uniform Chief Inspector, Mr. Berry.The Head of Administration was a civilian Mr.Green.

    Nowadays they have a Chief Officer, Deputy Chief officer, a Superintendent, four Chief Inspectors, numerous senior civilain officers and all to look after a police force (oops it’s now called a service), of around 240 officers. Why can’t the States cut back a bit on the hierarchy in the police, then maybe put a few more cops on the beat.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    428 CJ

    Well said Mr Pearce. You raise the fact which is the truth of the matter. It is the level of States spending, particularly the increase over the last 4 years which is the issue. Note also the commentary around drop of income caued by the credit crunch and required stimulus package – but consider please the 2011 income as planned for in the 06-11 plan being £537m, but as per the 2010 budget being £560m. So income goes up and we still have a deficit. Go figure !! As to police, consider also the current oversight of spending and the role of the accounting officer for Home affairs. This is a far from satisfactory situation, Haut de La Garenne being a good example of lack of sending control so another area worth investigating.

    Report abuse