Why are the States so hard on cyclists?

Tuesday 23rd March 2010, 2:59PM GMT.

From Pierre Théron.
HAVING only just survived the adult helmet vote, cyclists now face calls from Deputy Phil Rondel for compulsory bike registration.

Where is this all going to end? The narrowness of the vote is worrying and shows that many members are not serious about us adopting healthier lifestyles.

Cyclists are being deterred, bus fares increased and park and ride schemes have long since been abandoned. Many commuters used to adopt their own informal park and rides, for example in Goose Green car park (then the bus) and Victoria Avenue lay-bys (then walk) when these were free, but now you have to pay (in summer, at least, on Victoria Avenue) so there is no incentive to park out of town – this has been removed by the greed of Transport and Technical Services, who prefer to add to their £12m car park trading account which is obviously a greater priority. Any environmental transport policies we had are being eroded by bureaucracy, greed and indifference. It’s a complete joke.

Why does cycling cause so much comment and political debate on this Island? What exactly is the problem? While this Island is failing to provide adequate protection for employees (JEP, 10 March) which are basic and fundamental human rights, our politicians are banging on about cycling.

All cyclists are doing is using two wheels connected by some bits of metal to get about, without causing any congestion or noise or air pollution and without taking up any precious space on roads or in car parks, yet we are constantly vilified and threatened with endless bureaucracy and red tape.

We should wear helmets, we should be registered, we should have insurance, we should be restricted to cycle lanes, we should (unbelievably) have speedometers – and so it goes on.

Ben Shenton talks about not wanting to shoulder the costs of the occasional head injury as a taxpayer, but he is presumably perfectly happy for all of us to shoulder the ongoing burden of the obesity epidemic which costs him and the rest of us £7.4m a year.

There are lots of us making an environmental effort, even without any assistance from the States. But if cycling is going to be smothered in legislation then I simply won’t bother. I switched from car to bike for my daily commute three years ago but I’m really beginning to wonder why I’m being discouraged.


  1. 1
    Face Palm

    Perhaps cyclists are being deterred because, once they have paid the GST on their bike, the States no longer earn any money from them.

    Keep your leaders happy. Burn that petrol, use that car park. While you’re at it, smoke a packet of cigarettes too.
    Lovely, juicy taxes…mmmm.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Warren J

    Having seen a cyclist collide with someone on a brand new K series BMW motorcyle sending it flying, whilst the cyclist rode off, and having myself, as a pedestrian been hit by a cyclist on a pedestrian crossing, the outcome being a passing drunk saying to a States of Jersey police officer that I had assulted the cyclist, a fact that Plod was stupid enough to believe, legislation to regulate these uninsured, law breaking meanaces is long overdue.

    Cyclist scare me, they are above the law and nothing is done to bring them to book.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Dick Turpin

    Fine stuff coming from a Deputy in his Chelsea tractor and boat run on duty free marine fuel, you would never know this fellow is head of an environmental body would you.
    Did he not read the report on air quality and the public concerns about car fumes?

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Layon

    Pierre,

    I think your article is ludicrous. Bikes should be restricted to cycle lanes, should be registered, with insurance and most definitely have speedometers.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    J Lamborrari

    @ Layon #4
    “…Bikes should be restricted to cycle lanes…”
    Okay, but where is the cycle lane to get to my house?

    “…should be registered…”
    Fair enough, would you agree with compulsory ID cards?

    “…with insurance…”
    Should all people be required to have PL insurance?

    “…most definitely have speedometers…”
    Okay, but that’s going to require lots of pretty pointless legislation.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Michael

    Boooorrriiinnnggg!

    I cycle, and I want all of this legislation in place. Not because I agree with it, but because I want to be the first person in Jersey to have a criminal record for an “unregistered” and “uninsured” bike!

    Warren J….

    A great point you make… except you are making it and all we have to go on is your view. We don’t know if the witness was actually drunk, we don’t know what the cyclist has claimed and we don’t know if, just maybe, you assaulted a cyclist. What we can be sure of is that by using a derogatory term to the officer that was there you are unhappy with the decision that was made.

    Could it be that maybe, just maybe, you are fibbing a little?

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Warren J

    More than happy to put record straight, No.6.

    Incident occured at 5.15 pm after work when I along with my wife and another unrelated lady were crossing the road. Cyclist fell off. Drunk accused me of kicking the rear wheel from under cyclist. Totally untrue. Plod was called and as a result of this incident, was warned to attend Parish Hall. Plod gave me a RT1 form which I thought was strange as this is used for motorists who have to produce insurance at a later stage.

    Next day, phoned Plod and spoke to his Sergent, who advised that under the law, the cyclist did not have to stop at a crossing. He was wrong.

    The Parish Hall enquiry was a set up and just wasted my time. I was encouraged by a Senior Police Officer to lodge a complaint but due to a health issue in the family, I decided not to.

    The whole episode caused me a lot of stress, and I have since publically embassared the SoJ Police Force over an unrelated issue !

    No way was I fibbing, even a litte my freind, but very happy to put the record straight !

    Report abuse