Clothier Report: Regrettable that it’s not fully implemented

Wednesday 23rd June 2010, 3:00PM BST.

From Stanley Perkins, Professor Emeritus.
IT was with deep regret but interest that I read in the Jersey Weekly Post, Thursda, 13 May, of the death of Sir Cecil Clothier who had contributed such great public service to the Island with his ‘Review of the Machinery of Government in Jersey’, 1999 – 2001.

It is regrettable that ten years later the States of Jersey has only chosen to implement some of his recommendations. As noted in the Jersey Weekly Post, Thursday 20 May, under ‘Jersey’s first general election’, it states that half of the 12 senators, who enjoy six years in office, were being elected on one day. The other six senators would face the electorate three years later.

Such a process is contrary to Sir Clothier’s recommendations in his ‘Summary of Principal Findings and Recommendations’, December 2000, where he writes on page five: ‘The panel received no convincing evidence that there is a significant difference between the nature and content of the senators’ role in the States and that of the Deputies.’

He also recommended that: ‘An Electoral Commission should be set up to reassign the vacant seats of the Senators among the parishes.’ Why has the States not implemented these recommendations?

How does a Senator report back to an all Island electorate? Does he/she hold meetings in all 12 Parishes periodically to inform and consult with the electorate?

I doubt it. It is much easier for a Deputy, who represents a much smaller electorate, to hold such public information and consultation meetings occasionally with his/her electorate.

One recommendation which Sir Clothier’s report lacks is that of elected leadership. The current process does not allow for direct democracy. Instead of the public electing the leader it is left to the elected member of the States to do so. That is not direct democracy.

The way to solve the problem is to have the electorate vote on the position of Chief Minister, as is done with the president of a country or through elected parties when the electorate is aware of the party’s policies and platform and the party leader has been elected by the party members.

Under the present system of governance in Jersey, individual members who make commitments at election time have no way of implementing them if they cannot get sufficient support from other members in the States.

On the other hand, members of a party elected and committed to known policies and platform can implement such commitments if elected in sufficient numbers, and when led by a party leader who is elected directly by voters.
The University of British Columbia.


  1. 1
    God's Mentor

    UK doesn’t vote in it’s PM. Not sure why allowing the voting public the Chief Minister would be such a big win.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Mac

    That’s not what the writer is saying: he is saying that in the UK, people choose the PM by voting for a coherent party platform. At the end of the election you know there are enough members of one party behind one leader to form a government. Because we do not have party politics in Jersey, we have no way of guaranteeing we get what we want.

    A short history lesson: In the 2005 senatorial elections the candidate who topped the poll was Stuart Syvret. The current Chief Minister came in 5th. Syvret’s 15000+ votes outnumbered those for all of the candidates in the 2008 senatorials, and was approximately twice that of the current Treasury minister. We ended up with Ozouf and Le Sueur running the island.

    We put the candidates in in some sort of order of precedence, and the States ignores our choice: this is why the frequently-heard cry of “I can’t be bothered to vote, it will make no difference” has a grain of truth to it. The contempt is mutual.

    There is one small and simple change we can make that might go some way to resolving the issue, given that there is little appetite for party politics. Namely this: the constitutional settlement is changed such that the candidate with the most votes at the senatorial election is automatically offered first chance to form a new Council of Ministers. It should concentrate the minds of the candidates and those of the voters, and it should give real power back to the voting public.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Pip Clement

    We also have the bizarre secret ballot for Chief Minister with all the weaseling that entails on the part of some members.
    Jersey needs some daylight shone on it’s political processes before it is too late!

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    PJG

    Mac
    If we had done what you suggest in 2005 Syvret would have been cheif minister!
    God forbid!

    C Le Verdic
    Now did I or didn’t I?

    Report abuse

KIT 4 CLUBS

Win a share of £10,000 Win a share of £10,000

2012 is the year of the London Olympics and to celebrate this great event the Jersey Evening Post, in association with sponsors Ogier is giving all sporting clubs a chance to win a share of £10,000.