Business backs the Budget
Saturday 23rd October 2010, 3:00PM BST.
BUSINESS leaders have cautiously welcomed yesterday’s Budget proposals.
In one of the hardest-hitting Budget statements for decades, Treasury Minister Philip Ozouf revealed plans to increase GST to five per cent and force higher earners to pay more Social Security payments. The minister also announced duty increases on fuel, alcohol and tobacco.
Speaking shortly after the proposals were outlined to business leaders at a briefing at the Town Hall, Chamber of Commerce president Ray Shead said that there was ‘nothing unexpected in the Budget’.
He said: ‘There was nothing desperately new or unexpected in this. ‘I think we all knew that once the three-year moratorium on GST had expired it would soon be going up.
‘However, the increase in Social Security payments is a tax on the payroll. It would be on both employees and employers and potentially could make people think twice about recruiting.
Read the full story in the Jersey Evening Post.
Click here for subscription details.
Individual editions are also available online.
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
JOIN US ON...
Facebook and Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Got a story? Get in touch
KIT 4 CLUBS
Win a share of £10,000
2012 is the year of the London Olympics and to celebrate this great event the Jersey Evening Post, in association with sponsors Ogier is giving all sporting clubs a chance to win a share of £10,000.

As long as Chamber of Commerce president Ray Shead also accepts that there is even more reason for people to shop off island !!!
Report abuse
And we wonder why? anything to do with the fact it favors the rich?
The only positive cut is that to reduce the funding to the private schools.
Report abuse
A disaster for the economy. A tax on jobs and a tax on the least able. No creative thinking,same old solutions. Our government continues spending with total immunity no accountability like children with sweets, our sweets.
Report abuse
2. James Veal
How exactly does raising social security contributions for higher earners and increasing stamp duty on more expensive properties constitute favouring the rich?
Report abuse
@ James,
Please explain how this budget favours the rich?
Report abuse
Richard – exactly right in your points. It seems as though the majority of commentators on this blog simply want to live from States handouts from a Tall Poppy syndrome that exists from these trolls.
Even welathy look at this and are worse off, but they dont’ go rabbiting on about how unfair it is, they realise (with intelligence) that it is necessary.
The wealthy are the ones who suffer the most unfairness from paying such a large contribution through taxed incomes, receiving no handouts, and usually (like myself) have private health insurance, so operations etc., are paid for by my insurance, not from government handouts.
Report abuse
Real truthseeker 6.
Of course these Budget proposals don’t favour the rich, they’re simply not as hard as they could be on the really welathy…I suppose that’s how YOU pronounce ‘wealthy’ when your ‘fake’ British standard accent slips!
Report abuse
Has RT got ‘Tall Poppy syndrome’ set up as a macro?
He certainly likes ‘rabbiting on’ abotu (sic) it!
Report abuse
“The wealthy are the ones who suffer the most unfairness from paying such a large contribution through taxed incomes, receiving no handouts, and usually (like myself) have private health insurance, so operations etc., are paid for by my insurance, not from government handouts.”
But elsewhere you admit that your salary is paid through Monaco so you can avoid tax and Social Security!
If you are not paying anything in why should you expect anything out?
I know of one 1(1)K who had a liver transplant on the Jersey health system. His private insurance had no intention of paying and the alternative was letting him die so the generous Jersey tax payers ponied up the cash!
Report abuse