There’s no going back at Portelet – but we can stop building on Field 528

Saturday 23rd April 2011, 3:00PM BST.

From Ian Ronayne.
YOUR paper’s recent focus on the new development at Portelet, and people’s response to it, made compelling reading.

The heartfelt and emotive nature of some the published letters and emails showed just how deeply people feel about this exploitation of one of the Island’s most picturesque bays. If nothing else, the consensus seems to be that allowing this development to go ahead was a mistake.

In mitigation, one of the defences put forward by the Environment Minister is that permission to build had already been given, and therefore it was about trying to minimise the impact by working with the developers to come up with the best possible design. Whatever your readers’ opinions on the final result, one thing appears to be for sure – once permission is given there is no going back. It then often just becomes a matter of damage limitation.

I believe we should heed this lesson for the future. While perhaps not in the same league as Portelet Bay, Field 528 opposite St Saviour’s School is under threat of development. There has been no planning application yet to build on this lovely open space, or permissions granted, but the process is in motion – albeit behind closed doors. Given past precedents, however, once momentum for development is built up, there seems to be no stopping it, so now is the time to oppose before it becomes just another matter of damage limitation.

And like Portelet, this should not just be a matter of concern for local residents, but something for everyone in Jersey to resist if they feel another mistake is about to be made. The parishioners of St Saviour have taken the unorthodox step of demanding a Parish Assembly to voice their opposition to the development of Field 528 and to ask for the support of their elected representatives.

It takes place at 7.30 pm on Tuesday 3 May at St Saviour’s Parish Hall. It seems a great opportunity for everyone opposed to inappropriate development in our Island to stand together in an effort to stop history repeating itself.


  1. 1
    Tony

    Also in tonight article re Constable Hanning against Longueville Nurseries development due to “over building & traffic problems in St Saviour” surely this goes against his support of developing field 528?

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Overpopulaed

    Why not use the old Girls College site for this
    ‘necessary’ development – it belongs to the States is a large site and has been empty for years?

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Sous L'eglise

    The states rezoned the fields behind the parish hall partly on the basis that it would accommodate such a facility. Now that facility is missing from the plans, a private medical facility has found its way in and numerous other changes have happened to make this drastically depart from one of the fundamental reasons for rezoning it.

    Who decided to mislead the states?

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Dan Dara

    From La Cloche, the St Saviour parish newsletter
    Autumn 2010 – Page 10

    http://www.parish.gov.je/upload_docs/21163-1524622122010.pdf

    “Plans also include a village community hall, an exercise facility, tea room, hair salon, snooker room, library, doctor’s surgery, office and kiosk.”

    Can someone explain why, only last October, Peter Hanning was enthusiastic about having this situated in the development behind the Parish Hall and now, it appears, it has fallen off the plans and he wants to build exactly the same in Field 528.

    If that is where it was supposed to go why put it somewhere else?

    Report abuse

KIT 4 CLUBS

Win a share of £10,000 Win a share of £10,000

2012 is the year of the London Olympics and to celebrate this great event the Jersey Evening Post, in association with sponsors Ogier is giving all sporting clubs a chance to win a share of £10,000.