Plans for masts on Minquiers and Ecréhous are scrapped

Saturday 26th January 2013, 12:00PM GMT.

How one of the masts would look, if approved by Planning
How one of the masts would look, if approved by Planning

PLANS to build 33-ft weather masts on the main islands of the Minquiers and Ecréhous have been scrapped after serious concerns were raised by Islanders.

Instead the masts, which would monitor wind speeds and inform future plans for harnessing renewable energy, could be placed out to sea on outlying rocks.

The Environment department has this week submitted plans for masts in two locations, one 3 km from the main Ecréhous island and the other 6 km from the main Minquiers island.


Read the full story in the Jersey Evening Post. Click here for subscription details. Individual editions are also available online.


  1. 1
    Captain Fantastic

    So is this the new planning protocol: If something is controversial place it a on site that should receive the upmost protection. I suppose Portlet, Plemont(to be), and La Coupe developments set a precedent.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    colin

    It seems that these people have nothing to do a work!!!! apart from come up with c….p like this

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    thumbinb*m

    What about putting these masts at Trinity ?
    perfect I would think, quiet and the highest place in the Island, I´m sure the people of Trinity would not have any objections.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    D De Jersey

    How ironic… the people with holiday cottages on the the SSSI moan about something slightly more out of place than they are.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Alphonse

    https://www.mygov.je//Planning/Pages/PlanningApplicationDetail.aspx?s=1&r=P/2013/0091

    I suggest people object to the proposal whilst they can on the link above.

    Report abuse

Wednesday 22 May

  • Teachers vote to strike
  • Abuse victims being tracked by smartphones
  • New business district gets go-ahead
  • Sport in Jersey: More major events on the way?
  • JEP Parenting: Safe sleeping
  • Comment: Lucy Stephenson