We do not want vulture fund business in the Island
Tuesday 22nd November 2011, 3:00PM GMT.
From Geoff Cook, chief executive, Jersey Finance.
FURTHER to the leader column in your latest issue entitled ‘Keep the Vultures at a Distance’ (JEP, 18 November) it is inevitable that the brevity required in a 400 word column can never capture the real detail behind a story. However, more often than not this column does express what people in the Island are thinking in an insightful, succinct and helpful way, and is certainly the first item I turn to in the JEP.
There is though some detail around the ‘Vulture’ story which I would like to provide in order that your readers are fully informed.
The term vulture fund is ugly and many would say it describes an ugly business; a business about which I wrote to the Finance Industry back in 2007, asking colleagues to use their best endeavours to prevent these kinds of funds being set up in Jersey.
As far as we can establish there are no such funds in Jersey, and by placing this kind of activity on the Jersey Financial Services Commission Sensitive activity list we have made it clear to the world that we do not want this kind of business.
Over the last few years a number of countries including France and the USA have investigated and then given up on introducing laws to limit claims, as definition problems around identifying this kind of activity, while safeguarding the ability to enforce legitimate contracts is extremely difficult.
The United Kingdom began work on this issue in 2009 and uniquely introduced a law in 2010 with a sunset clause, clearly signalling this was a trial. This was due to the uncertainty as to whether this law could successfully be sustained. On 8 June 2011 the decision was made to continue with the law and make it a permanent feature of the statute book.
On 15 September 2011 a green paper was issued by the States of Jersey, which consults on introducing a similar law to the UK. The laws introduced do not stop claims being brought through courts, and there is no legal loophole, as misleadingly reported by the Jubilee Debt campaigners. Access to legal protection and redress is a fundamental human right enshrined in all democracies and we discriminate as to who should have access to these fundamental rights of access at our peril.
Instead the legislation introduced by the UK and that which Jersey is consulting on is designed to limit the amount of claims and to facilitate significant discounts to the face value of debt recognising the special circumstances of poorer countries, while ensuring legitimate access to the legal process.
However, there are significant risks, to legitimate claims and business. Laws which are rushed are generally not good laws, and can frequently have significant unintended consequences.
A consequence of such a law, if not very carefully drafted, could be to incentivise corrupt politicians and governments of poorer nations to shift assets to Jersey, simply to limit or defeat their legitimate obligations to repay loans made on reasonable terms. We do not want to become a safe harbour for the corrupt and unscrupulous.
As far as we can tell there is no imminent hearing of the case involving the DRC (Democratic Republic of Congo) by the Privy Council, but laws in Jersey cannot be placed onto the statute book in an instant.
Should the States of Jersey seek to emulate the UK law, there would still be a requirement for approval by the Privy Council in the UK which can take up to six months.
In addition Jersey firms will wish to scrutinise any law which effectively involves interfering with the law of contract most carefully, our reputation and integrity as a respected international finance centre demands nothing less than a thorough review.
In a career spanning over 30 years in financial services, which has taken me across the globe, I have discovered no jurisdiction that has such a commitment to truth, transparency and integrity as Jersey.
Our reputation is everything, we guard it jealously, and defend it vigorously. If we can act to assist those who are less well-off while upholding the principles of international law, we will, and as quickly as we can.
Travel
To, from and around the Island
Airport Arrivals/Departures
Harbours Arrivals/Departures
Bus Information/Timetables
JOIN US ON...
Facebook and Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Got a story? Get in touch
KIT 4 CLUBS
Win a share of £10,000
2012 is the year of the London Olympics and to celebrate this great event the Jersey Evening Post, in association with sponsors Ogier is giving all sporting clubs a chance to win a share of £10,000.
“In a career spanning over 30 years in financial services, which has taken me across the globe, I have discovered no jurisdiction that has such a commitment to truth, transparency and integrity as Jersey.”
I cite Richard Murphy, UK economist and tax specialist in reply.
“Well sometimes you have to laugh or you’d cry.
Let me ask Geoff about these commitments to transparency:
•Why is it possible for vulture funds to use Jersey?
•Why can no one see the accounts of a Jersey company?
•Why is it usually impossible to find out who owns or controls a Jersey company?
•Why do you allow sham trusts that let the settlor also be the beneficiary and to control the trust – a concept alien to real trust law?
•Why won’t you fully information exchange under the European Union Savings Tax Directive?
•Why does the UK think you non-cooperative for information exchange purposes?
•Why have you not signed tax information exchange agreements with almost any developing country?
•Why do so many scandals and frauds seem to find their way to Jersey?
•Why do so many banks have so many subsidiaries in Jersey about which no one knows anything?
•Why has Jersey helped to undermine the PAYE system in the UK through the use of employee benefit trusts, and so repeatedly?
•Why has Dave Hartnett had to say the information exchange deals with jersey don’t give him all the information he needs?
•Why did you fight so hard to charge no tax on offshore companies using Jersey whilst increasing it heavily on the people of your island?
Go on Geoff, just answer, in full.”
Report abuse
But not that bothered about entities domiciled over here set up to practice transfer pricing abuses or our trust companies who are happy to accept the money of Russian “businessmen” and their ilk who if you scratch more than the surface of the provenance of their funds then you will find that it comes from that period when the Russian government gifted the family silver to its cronies and KGB henchmen. Way to go Jersey.
Report abuse